Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LACESTE v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 2:16-cv-02063-LEK. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161118949 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FOR FRAUD, ETC. [E.D. Cal. Local R. 144(a)] LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI , District Judge . ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FOR FRAUD, ETC. Having considered the Stipulation between Plaintiffs ALFREDO LACESTE and VERONICA LACESTE (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. ("Defendant"), wherein the Parties agreed to extend the time for Defe
More

ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FOR FRAUD, ETC. [E.D. Cal. Local R. 144(a)]

ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FOR FRAUD, ETC.

Having considered the Stipulation between Plaintiffs ALFREDO LACESTE and VERONICA LACESTE (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendant SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. ("Defendant"), wherein the Parties agreed to extend the time for Defendant to respond to and file an answer or other responsive pleading or motion to the Complaint in this proceeding to December 5, 2016, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's deadline to file an answer or other responsive pleading or motion to the Complaint in this proceeding is extended through and including December 5, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer