ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in an action seeking judicial review of an administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security that denied, in whole or in part, Plaintiff's claim for benefits under the Social Security Act.
Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, within
Once the administrative record has been filed, the parties must try to resolve the case informally. In this process, the parties exchange informal briefs in the form of letters about the case to see if they can agree that the case should be sent back, or "remanded," to the Social Security Administration for a further hearing by an administrative law judge.
In the letter brief, Plaintiff must briefly set forth: (1) the issues in the case; (2) the reasons why Plaintiff thinks that Plaintiff is entitled to Social Security benefits; and (3) why the decision to deny benefits should be remanded.
The letter brief must be marked "Confidential Letter Brief," should not be filed with the Court, and must be served on defendant
The name of the attorney or attorneys representing Defendant is added to the court docket at the time the Court receives Defendant's response to the complaint (typically the administrative record). Sometimes the court docket lists not only an attorney at the office of the General Counsel of the Social Security Administration in San Francisco, CA, but also an attorney at the United States Attorney's Office in Fresno, CA. If this is the case, Plaintiff must mail copies of the confidential letter brief to more than one attorney for Defendant.
Defendant's confidential letter brief must be served on Plaintiff no later than
If the parties agree to a remand, then the case will go back to the Social Security Administration before any formal briefs are filed with the Court, and without the Court considering the merits of the case. The parties' agreement to remand the case must be set forth in writing in a document titled "Stipulation and Order," which must be signed and filed with the Court no later than
The informal letter briefs exchanged by the parties are confidential in that they are not filed with the Court. If the parties are unable to agree to a remand, the letters are not part of the case file and, thus, are not before the Court if and when the Court finally considers the case on the merits.
If, after exchanging confidential letter briefs, the parties are unable to agree to a remand of the case, then the parties must file formal briefs with the Court as directed in the Scheduling Order. It is only after the formal briefs are filed with the Court that the Court will consider the merits of the case and make a decision.
Plaintiff's opening brief must be filed and served no later than
Plaintiff must also file the original opening brief, together with a copy, with the Court, by either personal delivery or via U.S. mail to:
Plaintiff's opening brief must contain the following:
(1) a plain description of plaintiff's alleged physical or emotional impairments, when plaintiff contends they became disabling, and how they disabled plaintiff from work;
(2) a summary of the administrative proceedings before the Social Security Administration;
(3) a summary of the relevant testimony at the administrative hearing;
(4) a summary of all relevant medical evidence, including an explanation of the significance of clinical and laboratory findings, and the purpose and effect of prescribed medication and therapy;
(5) a recitation of the Social Security Administration's findings and conclusions relevant to plaintiff's claims;
(6) a short, separate statement of each of plaintiff's legal claims stated in terms of the insufficiency of the evidence to support a particular finding of fact or reliance on an erroneous legal standard; and,
(7) argument separately addressing each claimed error.
All references to the administrative record and all assertions of fact must be accompanied by citations to the administrative record. Argument in support of each claim of error must be supported by citation to legal authority and explanation of the application of such authority to the facts of the particular case.
Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Defendant's responsive brief is due filed and served on plaintiff within
Plaintiff may file a reply brief, but is not required to do so, within
Plaintiff's reply brief should respond to the arguments made in Defendant's responsive brief.
In some cases, instead of serving and filing an administrative record, Defendant may file a motion to dismiss the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, within
Plaintiff may oppose a motion to dismiss by filing and serving opposition to the motion within
The Court will consider a motion to dismiss only after receiving opposition from Plaintiff, or after the time for filing an opposition has passed. In ruling on a motion to dismiss the case, the Court may either: (1) deny the motion and proceed with the case, ordering the parties to proceed to file the administrative record, attempt informal resolution, and file briefs; or, (2) grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss all or part of the case.
The Court will consider the merits of the case only after all briefs have been filed, and may enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the determination of the Social Security Administration. The Court may or may not remand the case to the Social Security Administration for a further hearing.
Plaintiff is informed of the following:
In litigating this action, the parties must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California ("Local Rules"). A copy of the Local Rules may be obtained in the Clerk's Office at no charge.
Local Rule 206 is a special rule for social security actions. Under Local Rule 206 complaints shall contain the last four digits of Plaintiff's social security number only, i.e., XXX-XX-1234, and that Plaintiff shall privately disclose to defendant, within
Documents intended to be filed with the Court must be mailed to the Clerk of the Court in Fresno, California, at the address noted above.
Each document submitted for filing must include the original signature of the filing party or parties. Local Rule 131; Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a).
All documents filed with the Court must be submitted with an additional legible copy to be conformed for the Court's use. See Local Rule 133(d)(2).
After any Defendant has appeared in an action by filing a pleading responsive to the complaint (i.e., an answer or a motion to dismiss), all documents filed with the Court must include a proof of service stating that a copy of the document was served on the opposing party. See 28 U.S.C. § 1746; Fed.R.Civ.P. 5; Local Rule 135.
A pro se party has an affirmative duty to keep the Court and opposing parties apprised of a current address. If plaintiff moves and fails to file a notice of change of address, service of court orders at Plaintiff's prior address shall constitute effective notice. See Local Rule 182(f). If mail directed to Plaintiff is returned by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable, the Court will not attempt to re-mail it.