ROSEDALE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT v. J.F. EX REL. FEIGE, 1:16-CV-00147-JLT. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161207831
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING IN PART THE STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE BY WHICH THE ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED (Doc. 42) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Due to the needs of the settlement agreement, to complete a school site assessment, complete the IEP meeting and the District pay the settle amounts, the Court ORDERS: 1. No later than March 24, 2017, counsel SHALL file their stipulated dismissal. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. In the event coun
Summary: [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING IN PART THE STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE BY WHICH THE ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED (Doc. 42) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Due to the needs of the settlement agreement, to complete a school site assessment, complete the IEP meeting and the District pay the settle amounts, the Court ORDERS: 1. No later than March 24, 2017, counsel SHALL file their stipulated dismissal. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. In the event couns..
More
[PROPOSED] AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING IN PART THE STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE BY WHICH THE ACTION WILL BE DISMISSED
(Doc. 42)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
Due to the needs of the settlement agreement, to complete a school site assessment, complete the IEP meeting and the District pay the settle amounts, the Court ORDERS:
1. No later than March 24, 2017, counsel SHALL file their stipulated dismissal.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. In the event counsel determine they cannot complete the settlement by this deadline, no later than March 17, 2016, they SHALL file a joint request for additional time. The request SHALL set forth a comprehensive description of the impediments to dismissal and an explanation why these impediments could not more quickly be overcome.
Source: Leagle
