Center for Biological Diversity v. Ilano, 2:16-cv-02322-VC. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161207886
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PAGE LIMITS AND ORDER VINCE G. CHHABRIA , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 for the Northern District of California and the Court's December 1, 2016, Minute Order (ECF# 17), the Parties have conferred and jointly stipulate to the following page limits with respect to the briefing schedule that was set by the Court during the November 29, 2016, Case Management Conference: February 17, 2017 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PAGE LIMITS AND ORDER VINCE G. CHHABRIA , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 for the Northern District of California and the Court's December 1, 2016, Minute Order (ECF# 17), the Parties have conferred and jointly stipulate to the following page limits with respect to the briefing schedule that was set by the Court during the November 29, 2016, Case Management Conference: February 17, 2017 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in S..
More
JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PAGE LIMITS AND ORDER
VINCE G. CHHABRIA, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 for the Northern District of California and the Court's December 1, 2016, Minute Order (ECF# 17), the Parties have conferred and jointly stipulate to the following page limits with respect to the briefing schedule that was set by the Court during the November 29, 2016, Case Management Conference:
February 17, 2017 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and
Memorandum in Support shall be 25 pages or less;
March 13, 2017 Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary
Judgment and Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs'
Motion for Summary Judgment shall be 25 pages or less;
Defendant-Intervenor's Cross-Motion for Summary
Judgment and Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs'
Motion for Summary Judgment shall be 15 pages or less;
April 3, 2017 Plaintiffs' Combined1 Memorandum in Opposition to
Defendants' and Defendant-Intervenor's Cross-Motions
for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of Plaintiffs'
Motion for Summary Judgment shall be 28 pages or less;
April 17, 2017 Defendants' Reply in Support of their Cross-Motion
for Summary Judgment shall be 20 pages or less;
Defendant-Intervenor's Reply in Support of its Cross-Motion
for Summary Judgment shall be 10 pages or less;
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiffs will be filing a single combined brief in response to Defendants' and Defendant-Intervenor's Opening Briefs. The Parties have compromised and agreed that Plaintiffs will strive to use as few pages as possible and that a maximum of 28 pages strikes a proper balance in order to ensure Plaintiffs have enough space to address both Defendants' and Defendant-Intervenor's arguments.
Source: Leagle
