BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
On September 8, 2016, Plaintiff Jeremiah Posey, proceeding pro se in this action, was informed by an order of the Court that an Initial Scheduling conference in this matter would be held on December 20, 2016 at 8:30 am. (Doc. 2). On December 20, 2016, counsel for Defendants appeared for the scheduling conference, however, Plaintiff Jeremiah Posey failed to appear. As a result, the scheduling conference could not proceed without Plaintiff's appearance. Further, at the hearing, counsel for Defendants informed the Court that Plaintiff has refused to provide his telephone number and there has been no verbal communication with Plaintiff since this action was filed.
Therefore, Plaintiff SHALL show cause why he has failed to participate in these proceedings and obey the order of this Court and why sanctions, up to an including terminating sanctions, should not be imposed for his failure to appear at the initial scheduling conference and provide his telephone number. Plaintiff is further put on notice that failure to timely respond, as explained in this order, may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this action.
Eastern District of California Local Rule 131(a) provides that any party appearing pro se is required to provide "the name, address, and telephone number of the party." L.R. 131(a). Thus, Plaintiff is required to provide the Court and opposing counsel with his telephone number.
Eastern District of California Local Rule Local Rule 110 provides: "Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court." Local Rule 110. "District courts have inherent power to control their dockets," and in exercising that power, a court may impose sanctions including dismissal of an action. Thompson v. Housing Authority of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986). A court may dismiss an action with prejudice, based on a party's failure to prosecute an action or failure to obey a court order, or failure to comply with local rules. See, e.g. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with an order requiring amendment of complaint); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987) (dismissal for failure to comply with a court order); Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) (dismissal for failure to prosecute and to comply with local rules).
1.
2. Plaintiff's written statement
3. The Court also
4. Plaintiff
5. Defendants' counsel may appear at the show cause hearing in person or by telephone by contacting chambers at 1-877-411-9748; access code 3190866 prior to the conference;
6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this Order to Show Cause on Plaintiff by mail; and
7.
IT IS SO ORDERED.