Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

EL BEY v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICES, INC., 2:16-cv-2248 MCE GGH PS. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161228936 Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has paid the filing fee. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). On December 19, 2016, plaintiff filed a "request for summary judgment." (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff's motion is defectively noticed. See E. D. Local Rule 230(b). Even if the motion were properly noticed, it is premature. Two motions to dismiss are currently submitted and pe
More

ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and has paid the filing fee. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

On December 19, 2016, plaintiff filed a "request for summary judgment." (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff's motion is defectively noticed. See E. D. Local Rule 230(b). Even if the motion were properly noticed, it is premature. Two motions to dismiss are currently submitted and pending review by the court. Plaintiff is referred to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and E.D. Local Rule 260 for information regarding the timing and procedure for filing a summary judgment motion.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, filed December 19, 2016 (ECF No. 18), is vacated without prejudice to its refiling, if necessary, after the adjudication of the motions to dismiss.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer