LEDESMA v. COUNTY OF KERN, 1:14-cv-01634 DAD JLT. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170111935
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jan. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASE (Doc. 80) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 6, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action. (Doc. 80) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.". . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASE (Doc. 80) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On January 6, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action. (Doc. 80) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.". . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed...
More
ORDER CLOSING CASE
(Doc. 80)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On January 6, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action. (Doc. 80) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.". . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action in light of the notice of dismissal with prejudice filed and properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
