Filed: Jan. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2017
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE THE STATUS CONFERENCE SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . TO: THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, HONORABLE SHEILA K. OBERTO AND VINCENZA RABENN, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY: COMES NOW Defendant, ASHLEY WILLIAMS, by and through her attorney of record, DAVID A. TORRES hereby requesting that the status conference hearing currently set for Tuesday, January 17, 2017 be continued to Tuesday, February 21, 2017. I have spoken
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE THE STATUS CONFERENCE SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . TO: THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, HONORABLE SHEILA K. OBERTO AND VINCENZA RABENN, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY: COMES NOW Defendant, ASHLEY WILLIAMS, by and through her attorney of record, DAVID A. TORRES hereby requesting that the status conference hearing currently set for Tuesday, January 17, 2017 be continued to Tuesday, February 21, 2017. I have spoken t..
More
AMENDED STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE THE STATUS CONFERENCE
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
TO: THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, HONORABLE SHEILA K. OBERTO AND VINCENZA RABENN, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY:
COMES NOW Defendant, ASHLEY WILLIAMS, by and through her attorney of record, DAVID A. TORRES hereby requesting that the status conference hearing currently set for Tuesday, January 17, 2017 be continued to Tuesday, February 21, 2017.
I have spoken to AUSA Vincenza Rabenn and informed her that I am unavailable to appear for status on January 17, 2017. Co-counsel and the Government does not object to continuing this matter to February 21, 2017.
The parties also agree the delays resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interest of justice pursuant to 18 USC 3161 (h)(7)(A) and 3161 (h)(7)(B)(1) up to and including February 21, 2017.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The parties' request for a continuance of the status conference is DENIED. The parties are cautioned that a request for an extension of time must be supported by good cause and shall include a detailed explanation demonstrating due diligence, including a description of what actions have been undertaken, and what further actions are needed, to move the case forward. Counsel's calendar conflict alone does not constitute good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
