Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JOHNSON v. BAI, CIV. 2:16-1698 WBS GGH. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170126997 Visitors: 37
Filed: Jan. 24, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2017
Summary: ORDER REFERRING CASE TO VDRP AND VACATING PRIOR ORDER SETTING EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH THE ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . The court has determined that this case is appropriate for an early settlement conference and because of the limited availability of the assigned magistrate judge will refer the action to the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program ("VDRP"). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. This court's November 10, 2016 order setting the cas
More

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO VDRP AND VACATING PRIOR ORDER SETTING EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WITH THE ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The court has determined that this case is appropriate for an early settlement conference and because of the limited availability of the assigned magistrate judge will refer the action to the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program ("VDRP").

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. This court's November 10, 2016 order setting the case for an early settlement conference before the assigned magistrate judge is hereby VACATED. The parties shall contact the assigned magistrate judge and inform him of this order.

2. Within fourteen (14) days of this Order, the parties shall contact the court's VDRP administrator, Sujean Park, at (916) 930-4278 or SPark@caed.uscourts.gov, to start the process of selecting an appropriate neutral. The parties shall carefully review and comply with Local Rule 271, which outlines the specifications and requirements of the VDRP.

3. Any party that objects to this referral to the VDRP shall file its objections within seven (7) days of this Order. Such objections shall clearly outline why that party believes that the action is not appropriate for referral to the VDRP.

4. To avoid the unnecessary expenditure of costs and attorneys' fees, this action is hereby stayed to provide the parties time to complete the VDRP session. No later than five (5) days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties shall file a joint statement indicating whether a settlement was reached.

5. The parties shall complete the VDRP session no later than March 30, 2017. The court hereby resets the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for May 8, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. If a settlement is not reached through VDRP, the parties shall submit an Amended Joint Status Report no later than April 24, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer