Banuelos v. Berryhill, 1:16-CV-00687-EPG. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170127l30
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from February 6, 2017, to March 8, 2017 due to current workload demands. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists as counsel for Defendant has
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from February 6, 2017, to March 8, 2017 due to current workload demands. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists as counsel for Defendant has f..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from February 6, 2017, to March 8, 2017 due to current workload demands. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists as counsel for Defendant has four other pending responses due at or around the same time and a Ninth Circuit responsive brief due to the U.S. Attorney's Office shortly thereafter. Defendant respectfully requests additional time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment in order to adequately research and analyze the issues presented by Plaintiff. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
For the reasons stated in the stipulation, good cause appears to extend the time for responding to Plaintiff's opening brief from February 6, 2017, to March 8, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
