Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

STONINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. ADAMS, 2:16-cv-02577-MCE-DB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170127m46 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FRCP 26 MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties hereto, Plaintiff Stonington Insurance Company; Defendants Robert Adams, Saundra Adams, Creative Frontiers School, Inc. (the "Adams Defendants"); Defendant AO Doe and Defendant BR Doe, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem C Doe (collectively the "Parties"), submit the following stipulation and [proposed] order to
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FRCP 26

Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), the parties hereto, Plaintiff Stonington Insurance Company; Defendants Robert Adams, Saundra Adams, Creative Frontiers School, Inc. (the "Adams Defendants"); Defendant AO Doe and Defendant BR Doe, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem C Doe (collectively the "Parties"), submit the following stipulation and [proposed] order to extend the time for exchanging Initial Disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1)).

The Parties stipulate that good cause exists to extend the deadline for the Parties' Initial Disclosures based on the pending motion to dismiss or in the alternative, stay this lawsuit (the "Motion to Stay") filed by the Adams Defendants on February 10, 2017 and scheduled for hearing before this Court on February 23, 2017. The Parties stipulate to extend the deadline for exchanging their Initial Disclosures to (1) March 2, 2017 or (2) seven (7) days from the date the Court issues its ruling on the Motion for Stay, whichever is later.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION and based on the existence of good cause, it is hereby ordered that the deadline for the Parties' exchange of their Initial Disclosures (pursuant to FRCP 26(a)(1)) shall be extended to (1) March 2, 2017 or (2) seven (7) days from the date of the Court's ruling on the Motion to Stay, whichever is later.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer