Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PENDERGAST v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:16-cv-0552-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170210c01 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 15) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , District Judge . On February 6, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Doc. 15) Notably, the Scheduling Order allows for a single extension of thirty days by the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 7 at 4), which was previously used by Plaintiff. (Docs. 12, 13) Beyond that extension, "requests to modify [the schedu
More

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

(Doc. 15)

On February 6, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation for an extension of time for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff's opening brief. (Doc. 15) Notably, the Scheduling Order allows for a single extension of thirty days by the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 7 at 4), which was previously used by Plaintiff. (Docs. 12, 13) Beyond that extension, "requests to modify [the scheduling] order must be made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause." (Doc. 7 at 4) Based upon the information provided and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:

1. Defendant's request for an extension of time is GRANTED; and 2. Defendant SHALL file a response to the brief on or before February 27, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer