Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. GUZMAN, 2:11-CR-00119-06 WBS. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170210c09 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . On November 7, 2016, Ms. Guzman filed her motion to reduce sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). CR 271. The government filed its opposition on December 13, 2016. CR 275. Pursuant to this Court's order on January 18, 2017, the date due for the reply brief was February 3, 2017. CR 281. Ms. Radekin needs additional time to obtain and review all relevant records to determine if she is
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE

On November 7, 2016, Ms. Guzman filed her motion to reduce sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). CR 271. The government filed its opposition on December 13, 2016. CR 275. Pursuant to this Court's order on January 18, 2017, the date due for the reply brief was February 3, 2017. CR 281.

Ms. Radekin needs additional time to obtain and review all relevant records to determine if she is going to file a reply brief, and then to prepare the reply brief.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and request that the date due for the reply brief be modified to March 10, 2017. Assistant United States Attorney Jason Hitt has indicated he has no objection to the modification of the reply brief due date and has authorized Ms. Radekin to sign this stipulation on his behalf.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the unopposed request, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ordered that the date due for the reply brief to the government's opposition to defendant's motion to reduce sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) be modified to March 10, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer