NELSON v. COLVIN, 2:16-cv-02125-CKD. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170215a68
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file her motion for summary judgment be extended thirty (30) days until March 15, 2017. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accordance w
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file her motion for summary judgment be extended thirty (30) days until March 15, 2017. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accordance wi..
More
STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file her motion for summary judgment be extended thirty (30) days until March 15, 2017. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accordance with the current scheduling order due to counsel's current workload which has involved conflicting deadlines in unrelated matters.
SO STIPULATED:
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
