Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CARACHEO, 2:07-CR-00248-26 WBS. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170221d36 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . On October 13, 2016, Mr. Caracheo filed his motion to reduce sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). CR 1445. The government filed its opposition on November 16, 2016. CR 1464. Pursuant to this Court's order filed on January 6, 2017, the date due for the reply brief is February 16, 2017. CR 1488. Mr. Caracheo intends to file a reply; however, Ms. Radekin needs time to communicate with
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE

On October 13, 2016, Mr. Caracheo filed his motion to reduce sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). CR 1445. The government filed its opposition on November 16, 2016. CR 1464. Pursuant to this Court's order filed on January 6, 2017, the date due for the reply brief is February 16, 2017. CR 1488. Mr. Caracheo intends to file a reply; however, Ms. Radekin needs time to communicate with Mr. Caracheo in writing to discuss his disciplinary violations noted by the government in its opposition.

Accordingly, the parties stipulate and request that the date due for the reply brief be modified to March 20, 2017. Assistant United States Attorney Jason Hitt has indicated he has no objection to the modification of the reply brief due date and has authorized Ms. Radekin to sign this stipulation on his behalf.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the unopposed request, and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ordered that the date due for the reply brief to the government's opposition to defendant's motion to reduce sentence pursuant to § 3582(c)(2) be modified to March 30, 2017.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer