KIRKER-FELO v. BERRYHILL, 2:16-cv-0880-EFB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170301962
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to file her responsive pleading be extended until March 10, 2017. This is Defendant's third request for an extension of time to file her responsive pleading. The parties need additional time to discuss the terms of remand to the Agency. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agr
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to file her responsive pleading be extended until March 10, 2017. This is Defendant's third request for an extension of time to file her responsive pleading. The parties need additional time to discuss the terms of remand to the Agency. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agre..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to file her responsive pleading be extended until March 10, 2017. This is Defendant's third request for an extension of time to file her responsive pleading. The parties need additional time to discuss the terms of remand to the Agency. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agrees that all subsequent deadlines should be accordingly extended.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
