Medley v. McNeilus Truck and Manufacturing Inc., 2:15-cv-02453-TLN-CKD. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170302970
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses from March 1, 2017 to April 3, 2017, with the deadline to designate supplemental list of expert witnesses to be set twenty days thereafter on May 4, 2017. This additional time is necessary because Waste Management witnesses continue to be deposed and identified in response
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses from March 1, 2017 to April 3, 2017, with the deadline to designate supplemental list of expert witnesses to be set twenty days thereafter on May 4, 2017. This additional time is necessary because Waste Management witnesses continue to be deposed and identified in response ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCLOSURE CUTOFF DATE
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for disclosure of expert witnesses from March 1, 2017 to April 3, 2017, with the deadline to designate supplemental list of expert witnesses to be set twenty days thereafter on May 4, 2017. This additional time is necessary because Waste Management witnesses continue to be deposed and identified in response to Defendant McNeilus Truck and Manufacturing, Inc,'s FRCP 30(b)(6) deposition notice. Despite the parties' diligence in coordinating depositions and conducting discovery, the Parties wish to postpone the expert disclosures again to allow time to process the evidence expected from Waste Management's 30 (b)(6) deposition(s) before confirming their selection of experts and submitting their reports. Further, the parties have restarted settlement negiotations which will be hindered if the expert disclosure date is not amended.
Trial in this matter is set for August 7, 2017, and thus the amended schedule would still comport with the requirement that expert disclosures be made 90 days before trial. Fed. R. Civ. P.26(a)(2)(D). The requested extension will not affect any of the other dates set in this case. The parties have conferred and jointly agree to this extension.
SO STIPULATED.
PURSANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
