Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Thompson, 2:13-CR-00273-GEB (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170303999 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . The United States of America, through its counsels of record, Phillip A. Talbert, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and Matthew G. Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant Samuel Clinton Thompson, through his attorney, Ronald Peters, Esq, hereby stipulate and agree that the status conference scheduled for March 3, 2017 at 9:00 am should be continu
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

The United States of America, through its counsels of record, Phillip A. Talbert, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, and Matthew G. Morris, Assistant United States Attorney, and defendant Samuel Clinton Thompson, through his attorney, Ronald Peters, Esq, hereby stipulate and agree that the status conference scheduled for March 3, 2017 at 9:00 am should be continued to March 24, 2017 at 9:00 a.m.

The defense intends to discover additional information to the government, which may affect sentencing. It is anticipated that the defendant will enter a plea at the next hearing.

Parties agree that time should be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv), and Local Code T-4 — reasonable time to prepare and for continuity of counsel. The parties agree that time be excluded under this provision March 3, 2017 to and including March 24, 2017.

PROPOSED ORDER

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and defendant continuity of counsel. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and that the time from the date of the stipulation, March 3, 2017, to and including March 24, 2017.

It is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer