GARZA v. BERRYHILL, 2:16-cv-01706-KJN. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170303a16
Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HERE BY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment: • Defendant shall serve and file any opposition or counter-motion on or before April 12, 2017; • Plaintiff may se
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HERE BY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment: • Defendant shall serve and file any opposition or counter-motion on or before April 12, 2017; • Plaintiff may ser..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HERE BY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment:
• Defendant shall serve and file any opposition or counter-motion on or before April 12, 2017;
• Plaintiff may serve and file a reply within twenty days of service of defendant's opposition or counter-motion (on or before May 2, 2017).
Good cause exists to grant an extension because the Defendant has a higher workload than normal and needs more time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. In addition, Defendant's counsel will be on leave from March 3, 2017 to March 13, 2017.
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source: Leagle
