WALKER v. McCLOUD COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, 2:16-61 WBS CMK. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170308d62
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Pursuant to defendant's Objection to Final Pretrial Order and Request for Modification (Docket No. 24), the Final Pretrial Order is hereby amended to reflect that in addition to the other defenses listed in the Final Pretrial Order, defendant asserts the defense of failure to exhaust judicial remedies. In light of this amendment, the parties' trial briefs shall address the defense of failure to exhaust judicial remedies, in a
Summary: ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Pursuant to defendant's Objection to Final Pretrial Order and Request for Modification (Docket No. 24), the Final Pretrial Order is hereby amended to reflect that in addition to the other defenses listed in the Final Pretrial Order, defendant asserts the defense of failure to exhaust judicial remedies. In light of this amendment, the parties' trial briefs shall address the defense of failure to exhaust judicial remedies, in ad..
More
ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Pursuant to defendant's Objection to Final Pretrial Order and Request for Modification (Docket No. 24), the Final Pretrial Order is hereby amended to reflect that in addition to the other defenses listed in the Final Pretrial Order, defendant asserts the defense of failure to exhaust judicial remedies. In light of this amendment, the parties' trial briefs shall address the defense of failure to exhaust judicial remedies, in addition to all other issues listed in Section V of the Final Pretrial Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
