Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NAVA v. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, 2:17-cv-00296-MCE-DB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170313a25 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO EASTERN DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 144(a) MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Defendants PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., may have until April 4, 2017, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint in order to allow Defendants to obtain information necessary to file an Answer to the Complaint. This extension does not ex
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO EASTERN DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 144(a)

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that Defendants PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., may have until April 4, 2017, to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint in order to allow Defendants to obtain information necessary to file an Answer to the Complaint. This extension does not exceed the twenty-eight (28) days allowed under Eastern District Local Rule 144(a). This is the first stipulation for an extension of time between the parties. Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a), approval of this stipulation by the Court is not necessary.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the time for Defendants PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint shall be extended to Thursday, April 4, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer