CONSERVATION CONGRESS v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, 2:13-CV-01977-JAM-DB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170323937
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California 143 and 144, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate to the following adjustments to the briefing schedule on Plaintiff's Memorandum Brief as to the Appropriate Remedy for Violation of the National Environmental Policy Act (Amended Version), ECF No. 125: Brief Current Date
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California 143 and 144, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate to the following adjustments to the briefing schedule on Plaintiff's Memorandum Brief as to the Appropriate Remedy for Violation of the National Environmental Policy Act (Amended Version), ECF No. 125: Brief Current Date ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California 143 and 144, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate to the following adjustments to the briefing schedule on Plaintiff's Memorandum Brief as to the Appropriate Remedy for Violation of the National Environmental Policy Act (Amended Version), ECF No. 125:
Brief Current Date New Date
Federal Defendants' Response Brief March 20, 2017 March 23, 2017
Defendant-Intervenor's Response Brief March 27, 2017 March 30, 2017
Plaintiff's Reply Brief April 10, 2017 April 17, 2017
The changes are requested in order to accommodate Federal Defendants' request for additional time beyond the deadline of March 20, 2017, in order to have adequate time to prepare their response in light of counsel's case commitments and recent absence from the office for medical reasons. This is Defendant's first request for an extension to file its response brief, but the second adjustment to the briefing schedule for this motion. See ECF Nos. 122-23 (granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Adjust Deadlines for filing of Briefs on Appropriate Remedy).
Accordingly, the parties request the Court approve this Stipulation, and enter the proposed changes to the briefing schedule.
The Court having considered the Stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
