YOUNG v. SUN LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, 1:16-cv-00822-LJO-JLT. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170331i95
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE WITHOUT PREJUDICE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Counsel have stipulated to amend the case schedule based upon the defendant's expressed intent to file a motion for protective order to prevent the depositions of two employees of the defendant and a treating physician. (Doc. 23 at 2) However, because the defendant has not complied with the requirements of the scheduling order (Doc. 21 at 2-3), which is the precursor to filing a moti
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE WITHOUT PREJUDICE JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Counsel have stipulated to amend the case schedule based upon the defendant's expressed intent to file a motion for protective order to prevent the depositions of two employees of the defendant and a treating physician. (Doc. 23 at 2) However, because the defendant has not complied with the requirements of the scheduling order (Doc. 21 at 2-3), which is the precursor to filing a motio..
More
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
Counsel have stipulated to amend the case schedule based upon the defendant's expressed intent to file a motion for protective order to prevent the depositions of two employees of the defendant and a treating physician. (Doc. 23 at 2) However, because the defendant has not complied with the requirements of the scheduling order (Doc. 21 at 2-3), which is the precursor to filing a motion to compel, any consideration of amending the case schedule is not ripe. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. The stipulation to amend the case schedule (Doc. 23) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
