Filed: Mar. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE DISMISSAL SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 160(b), Plaintiffs Martin Korndobler, Stephan Ernst, Matt Miller, Christopher Cruz, and Gregory Chaney ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendant DNC Parks & Resorts at Sequoia, Inc. ("Delaware North") (collectively, the "Parties"), respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline to file the appropriate papers to dismiss this action three weeks to April 17, 2017. On
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE DISMISSAL SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 160(b), Plaintiffs Martin Korndobler, Stephan Ernst, Matt Miller, Christopher Cruz, and Gregory Chaney ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendant DNC Parks & Resorts at Sequoia, Inc. ("Delaware North") (collectively, the "Parties"), respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline to file the appropriate papers to dismiss this action three weeks to April 17, 2017. On F..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE DISMISSAL
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 160(b), Plaintiffs Martin Korndobler, Stephan Ernst, Matt Miller, Christopher Cruz, and Gregory Chaney ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendant DNC Parks & Resorts at Sequoia, Inc. ("Delaware North") (collectively, the "Parties"), respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline to file the appropriate papers to dismiss this action three weeks to April 17, 2017.
On February 24, 2017, Plaintiffs notified the Court of the Parties' settlement of this matter. See Dkt. No. 49. On February 27, 2017, in response to Plaintiffs' Notice of Settlement, the Court ordered the Parties to file the appropriate dismissal documents by March 27, 2017. See Dkt. No. 50. Since that time, the Parties have diligently finalized the terms of a settlement agreement and release of claims. The settlement agreement has been mailed to all five Plaintiffs for review and signature, however several Plaintiffs have yet to return a signed copy of the settlement agreement, due in part to the remote location where they live and work.
As such, because the terms of the settlement agreement have been finalized and the Parties are simply waiting for the signatures of several of the five Plaintiffs who live and work in a remote location, good cause exists for the Court to extend the deadline to file the appropriate papers to dismiss this action. In addition, the requested extension would not delay these proceedings, nor cause harm or prejudice to the Parties or their counsel because all pending dates in this matter have been vacated by this Court. See Dkt. No. 50.
Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline for the Parties to file dismissal documents to conclude this action three weeks to April 17, 2017.
ORDER
Pursuant to the above-stipulation of the Parties (Doc. 51), and good cause appearing, the Parties are hereby ORDERED to file appropriate papers to dismiss this action in its entirety on or before April 17, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
