Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Alvarez, 1:15-CR-00346-DAD-BAM. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170410b37 Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION TO SCHEDULE STATUS CONFERENCE, EXCLUDE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, and the California Highway Patrol, by and through its counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. On January 9, 2017, the government and the defendant appeared at a status confe
More

AMENDED STIPULATION TO SCHEDULE STATUS CONFERENCE, EXCLUDE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, and the California Highway Patrol, by and through its counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. On January 9, 2017, the government and the defendant appeared at a status conference and selected April 10, 2017 at 1 p.m. for a further status conference and waived excludable time.

2. On March 10, 2017, the California Highway Patrol filed a Motion to Quash Defendant's Subpoena.

3. On March 30, 2017, by minute order, this Court set a hearing date of April 10, 2017 at 10:00 A.M. for the California Highway Patrol's Motion to Quash.

4. The government is unavailable on the date and time of the hearing, and the defendant and the California Highway Patrol have stipulated to a hearing date and time of May 15, 2017 at 10 a.m.

5. In order to allow the defendant and the government enough time after the hearing on the Motion to Quash the subpoena to receive and review any documents resulting from that subpoena, and to further conduct plea negotiations, the defendant and the government have stipulated to have the next status conference set out to June 12, 2017 at 1 p.m.

6. Additionally, by this stipulation, the defendant and the government now move to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act until the status conference to be scheduled for June 12, 2017 at 1 p.m.

7. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a) Based on the above-stated findings, the hearing date and time for the California Highway Patrol's Motion to Quash be moved to May 15, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. b) Based on the above-stated findings, the status conference in this case be moved to June 12, 2017 at 1 p.m. c) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. d) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of April 10, 2017 to May 1, 2017 inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

8. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

FINDINGS AND ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED THAT the Motion hearing before Judge Drozd on April 10, 2017 at 10:00 AM is continued to May 15, 2017 at 10:00am in courtroom 5.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the 4th Status Conference and Set a Trial Date hearing is continued from April 10, 2017 at 1:00PM to June 12, 2017 at 1:00PM before Judge McAuliffe in courtroom 8.

Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer