Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GALLO GLASS COMPANY v. SPECIAL SHAPES REFRACTORY COMPANY, INC., 1:16-cv-01446-LJO-BAM. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170412b78
Filed: Apr. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PROTECTIVE ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Gallo Glass Company, Defendant and Cross-Defendant Special Shapes Refractory Company, Inc., and Defendant and Cross-Claimant Nikolaus Sorg GmbH & Company KG through their respective counsel of record, that: I. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT The allegations in the pleadings in this action contemplate that during the course of litigation, certa
More

STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Gallo Glass Company, Defendant and Cross-Defendant Special Shapes Refractory Company, Inc., and Defendant and Cross-Claimant Nikolaus Sorg GmbH & Company KG through their respective counsel of record, that:

I.

GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT

The allegations in the pleadings in this action contemplate that during the course of litigation, certain proprietary, confidential and trade secret information will need to be disclosed. In connection with the discovery in this action, the Parties and certain third-party witnesses may produce documents, electronically stored information and materials that contain such information. Absent a protective order, production of certain documents and information may cause prejudice or harm if made publicly available.

II.

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

The purpose of this Stipulated Protective Order is to provide a means for limiting access to, and the use and disclosure of, protected documents and information that are produced in this action. Accordingly, the Parties hereto stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order (the "Order" or "Stipulated Protective Order"). The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery, and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The Parties further acknowledge that any Party seeking to seal Documents filed with the Court shall be required to comply with Local Rule 141.

III.

DEFINITIONS

A. Information designated as "Confidential" or "Confidential Information" or "Confidential Material," shall be fully protected by this Order. All portions of transcripts, depositions, exhibits, or other pleadings or filings in this action which contain or otherwise set forth Documents, information, or other materials, or contents thereof, which have been previously designated as Confidential, shall likewise be subject to the terms of this Order.

B. "Communicate" (or variants) means to disclose, show, give, list, describe, provide, make available, furnish or allow exposure of information in any fashion to any person, including without limitation any mailing, faxing, hand delivery, photograph, electronic, digital or any other duplication or distribution method;

C. "Copy" or "Copies" means reproductions made through any process, including but not limited to photocopying or photographic, any form of reproduction, manual recopying, microfilm, dictation, or mechanical, visual, digital or electronic duplication which in any way attempts to produce the substance, form, or content of information;

D. "Designating Party" shall mean any Party or Non-Party who designates any material or information under this Stipulated Protective Order as Confidential.

E. "Document" or "Documents" includes all written, recorded, digital, electronic or graphic material, whether produced or created by a Party, Non-Party, or another person and whether produced pursuant to formal or informal discovery, pursuant to subpoena, by agreement or otherwise, and includes both those items of a tangible nature and any digital and/or computer files;

F. "Party" means any person or entity named in this litigation;

G. "Party Affiliates" for purposes of this Stipulated Protective Order means E. & J. Gallo Winery (with respect to Plaintiff Gallo Glass Company).

H. "Person" means any natural person, or any legal or business entity, profit or nonprofit organizations, or any governmental agency;

I. "Producing Party" means the Party who produced Confidential Documents or Information;

J. "Conclusion of this litigation" shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law.

K. "Professional Vendors" include Persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors.

L. "Non-Party" means any person or entity not named in this litigation.

IV.

RESTRICTIONS

1. During the course of litigation, any Party may seek to have discovery material classified as "Confidential." Confidential Material includes, but is not limited to: (a) a trade secret; (b) sensitive marketing, merchandising, corporate, or financial information; (c) private information regarding the Parties, Party Affiliates, or a third party; (d) a personnel record of any third party; or (e) any Document subject to a confidentiality agreement. Confidential Material may be designated by any Party as being subject to the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Any Party or Non-Party ("Designating Party") may designate as Confidential any material if the Party in good faith believes that it contains Confidential commercial, financial, proprietary, or personal information.

2. Confidential Documents and the information contained therein shall be used by the Parties and those Persons identified in Paragraph 3 (covered Persons) only for the purpose of the prosecution or defense of this captioned action, and shall not be Communicated in any manner to anyone other than those Persons identified in Paragraph 3, without order of the Court after due notice to the Producing Party. Each and every Confidential Document produced (including Copies, excerpts, digests, summaries or indices thereof) by a Party or Non-Party shall be clearly marked and identified with one or the other of the following legends in red ink:

Option One:

CONFIDENTIAL

THIS DOCUMENT PRODUCED UNDER COURT ORDER FOR USE IN

GALLO GLASS COMPANY v. SPECIAL SHAPES REFRACTORY COMPANY AND NIKOLAUS SORG GMBH & COMPANY KG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01446-LJO-BAM AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE WHATSOEVER.

Option Two:

CONFIDENTIAL U.S.D.C., E.D. CAL. CASE NO. 1:16-CV-01446-LJO-BAM

In the event any Party or Non-Party creates a computer database, disk, compact disk, drive, digital or other electronic record containing Confidential Documents or information, the Party or Non-Party creating such an electronic record shall mark the case or envelope containing the material with the language contained in Paragraph 2. Documents printed from such electronic media shall be marked the same as Documents originally produced on paper.

If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party's right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must take reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

If it comes to a Designating Party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

3. Confidential Documents and information shall not be given, shown, made available, discussed or otherwise Communicated in any way except to a "Covered Person." Covered Persons are defined as follows:

a. The Court or Courts in which this litigation is being pursued;

b. The Party and Party Affiliates including their respective officers, directors and managing employees, and/or a Person employed by a corporate Party or Party Affiliate who is participating in the management of this litigation and the preparation of this case;

c. The attorneys of record for the Parties and their associated attorneys, including the employees of any such attorneys to whom it is necessary that the material be shown for purposes of the litigation;

d. Independent consultants, or other independent experts retained by a Party or an attorney of record to assist in the preparation of this litigation, and who have signed Exhibit A.

e. Court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, mediators, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed Exhibit A.

f. During their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary who are authors or recipients of the document, unless otherwise agreed by the Party designating the document as Confidential or ordered by the court.

4. Deposition testimony relating to or discussing a Party's Confidential Information shall be protected under this Order and the entire transcript including such testimony shall be treated as confidential for a period of 30 days after the court reporter serves Copies of the transcript on the Parties. Within those 30 days, the proponent of confidential treatment of all or any portion of the deposition shall serve on all counsel of record a designation of confidentiality that identifies by page those pages to be marked with the Confidential legend of Paragraph 2. The transcripts of such deposition testimony shall be treated the same under this Order as other Documents marked Confidential. The court reporter and videographer, if any, for any such deposition, shall be provided a copy of this Order by the Party at whose instance the deposition is taken, shall acknowledge this Order on the record and shall not disclose to anyone other than those specified in Paragraph 3 any deposition testimony or exhibit in this case.

5. Confidential Documents and information shall not be given, shown, made available, discussed or otherwise Communicated to anyone other than the attorneys of record for a Party without first informing them of the contents of this Order. In the case of Persons specified in 3(d) and 3(e) herein above, counsel shall obtain from such Person a signed acknowledgment, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Counsel making such disclosure shall retain the original acknowledgment (Exhibit A).

6. Any Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time.

a. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party's confidential designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidential designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. However, the Parties agree that all challenges to a Designating Party's confidential designations of materials produced in this litigation, including transcripts and productions from non-parties, must be communicated to the Court no later than the expert discovery cut-off deadline in the case management schedule ordered in this action.

b. The Party challenging confidentiality designation(s) (the "Challenging Party") shall initiate the dispute resolution process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each challenge; boilerplate challenges applied to large groups of documents are insufficient. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph of this Order. The Parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must begin this process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialog; other forms of communications are not sufficient) within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of the initial notice. In conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and the Designating Party, after having an opportunity to review the challenge and the designated material, must either withdraw the designation or explain the basis for the challenged designation. If the Parties cannot resolve the dispute through meeting and conferring, the Designating Party must explain in writing the basis for the challenged designation. Upon reviewing the Designating Party's explanation, the Challenging Party may either withdraw its challenge or proceed with its challenge by giving further written notice to the Designating Party that the Challenging Party contests the confidentiality designation(s), with such notice to contain a description of the bases on which the challenge is made and an unambiguous statement that the Challenging Party believes further conferring on the issue is futile (the "Final Challenge Notice"). A Challenging Party which withdraws its challenge without submitting a Final Challenge Notice does not waive its right to later initiate a new challenge regarding the same confidentiality designations based on new facts or circumstances. No Party may seek judicial intervention to resolve a confidentiality challenge without completing this meet and confer process or establishing that the opposite Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner first.

c. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without Court intervention, the challenge shall be resolved through informal telephonic conference pursuant to Paragraph 6 of Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe's standard Case Management Procedures. The Designating Party shall contact the Court no later than twenty-one (21) calendar days after the service of the Final Challenge Notice to obtain available teleconference dates and times from Judge McAuliffe's courtroom deputy, or by a date mutually agreed to contemporaneously by the Challenging Party and Designating Party. The Parties shall then agree upon a date and time, and the Designating Party shall confirm with the courtroom deputy when the parties will call in. At least forty-eight (48) hours prior the date and time of the teleconference, the Parties shall e-mail Judge McAuliffe's chambers (barnorders@caed.uscourts.gov) a two-page synopsis of their dispute in a letter or memo format (no exhibits or attachments). Failure by the Designating Party to timely request a teleconference with the Court shall automatically waive its assertion of confidentiality as to all designations challenged in the Final Challenge Notice.

The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. All Parties agree to abide by the resolution determined by Judge McAuliffe. Should Judge McAuliffe determine that an informal resolution cannot be reached, it shall be the burden of the Designating Party to seek any appropriate relief under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the relevant Local Rules, on such schedule as the Court and Parties shall determine. Failure of the Designating Party to do so in a timely manner shall result in the waiver of all confidentiality designations challenged in the Final Challenge Order. All Parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Designating Party's designation while any challenge or subsequent motion is pending.

In the event this case is reassigned to another Magistrate Judge for any reason, the Parties agree to confer in good faith to agree upon substitute procedures regarding the challenging of confidentiality designations, consistent with their obligations under this agreement and such Magistrate Judge's Case Management Procedures.

d. Designations or challenges as to confidentiality that are unsupported by facts or law, or are not made in good faith (e.g., are made to harass, obstruct, or impose unnecessary expenses an burdens on the other Parties), may expose the Designating Party, in the case of designations of confidentiality, or the Challenging Party, in the case of challenges to confidentiality designations, to sanctions.

7. All writings submitted to or filed with the Court in connection with any pre-trial proceedings which contain, set forth, summarize or otherwise disclose Confidential Documents or information shall be filed under seal and such Documents shall not be publicly available, except by further order of this Court. The Parties acknowledge Local Rule 141 governs the filing of Documents under seal.

8. At the trial of this cause, the Parties agree that the protection of the confidentiality of Confidential Documents shall continue to the maximum extent permitted by the Court, pursuant to such procedures as the Court may require.

9. If any Party or Person that has obtained Confidential Documents or information under the terms of this Order receives a subpoena or other legal process commanding the production of any such Confidential Documents or information ("the subpoena"), such Party or Person shall promptly notify the Party or Person that designated the Documents or information as Confidential of the service of the subpoena. The Party or Person receiving the subpoena shall not produce any Confidential Document or information in response to the subpoena without either the prior written consent of the Producing Party, or an order of a court of competent jurisdiction. However, the Producing Party in such case shall have the burden of seeking a court order relieving the subpoenaed Party or Person of the obligations of the subpoena prior to the return date of such subpoena, or the subpoenaed Person or Party shall be relieved of its obligations under this paragraph.

10. The inadvertent production in the course of discovery in this action of any Document or information (whether designated as Confidential or not) shall not be deemed to waive whatever attorney-client privilege, work product protection or other privilege or immunity that would otherwise attach to the Document or information produced or to other Documents or information, as long as the Producing Party or Person, promptly after discovery of the inadvertent production, notifies the other Party or Parties of the claim of privilege or other protection or immunity. When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the Parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, the Parties may incorporate their agreement in this Order submitted to the court.

11. The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in this action and designated as Confidential. Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections.

12. In the event that a Party ("the Producing Party") is required, by a valid discovery request from another Part ("the Requesting Party"), to produce a Non-Party's confidential information in its possession, and the Producing Party is subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party's confidential information entered before this action commenced, then the Producing Party shall:

a. Promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party, including identifying that confidentiality agreement and providing a copy of that confidentiality agreement to the Requesting Party;

b. Promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order in this litigation, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the information requested; and

c. Make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party.

If the Non-Party fails to object or seek a protective order from this court, either by serving objections on the Requesting Party or seeking a protective order from this court, including by having the Receiving Party do so on its behalf, within fourteen (14) days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party's confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely objects, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court.1 The Non-Party and/or Receiving Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking any protection beyond what is already provided in this Stipulated Protective Order, including the burden of persuasion to establish any requested materials are protected under this Stipulated Protective Order. Frivolous objections to legitimate discovery requests may subject a Non-Party and/or Receiving Party to sanctions.

13. If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Confidential Material to any person or in any circumstances not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all of the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit "A."

14. The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party; and (c) a Party's use of its own Confidential documents and information.

15. Within ten (10) days after the Conclusion of this litigation, unless the Court orders otherwise, Counsel for any Party who receives Confidential Documents or information from the other Party shall notify in writing Counsel for the other Party of the total number of Exhibit "A"s Counsel caused to be executed pursuant to paragraphs 3(d) and 3(e).

16. Within twenty-one (21) days after the Conclusion of this litigation, unless the Court orders otherwise, Counsel for any Party who received Confidential Documents or information shall request from all Persons to whom Confidential Documents and information have been provided an affidavit in the form of Exhibit B hereto. The request shall include notification to the recipients that the litigation has concluded. Copies of such requests shall be sent to the other Party.

17. Within fourteen (14) days of receipt of notice of the Conclusion of this litigation, each Covered Person under Paragraph 3(d) and 3(e) of this Order shall:

a. return to the counsel that disclosed Confidential Documents or information to them all Confidential Documents and all documentary materials reflecting Confidential Information which are in his/her possession, custody or control; and

b. serve upon the disclosing counsel an affidavit in the form of Exhibit B, attesting that he/she has returned all Confidential Documents and Information.

18. Unless the Court orders otherwise, within sixty (60) days after the Conclusion of this litigation, every counsel who has received the Confidential Documents or information of another Party shall:

a. return the original and all Copies of the Confidential Documents provided by the Producing Party which are in the possession, custody or control of such counsel; and

b. either deliver to counsel for the Producing Party all documentary materials reflecting information contained in or derived from Confidential Documents provided by the Producing Party which are in the possession, custody or control of such counsel; OR

c. destroy such documentary materials, and notify counsel for the Producing Party in writing that such action has been taken; and

d. file under seal, all original executed affidavits received; and

e. Inform counsel for the Producing Party in writing of the identity of any Confidential Documents or information contained in or derived from such Documents, known to such counsel, which have not been returned and/or destroyed in the manner required by this Order, and the identity of any Person who has failed to return each such Confidential Document and/or item of Confidential Information.

19. Nothing in this Order shall limit or otherwise affect:

a. the rights of any Party to object to any further production or use at trial of Confidential Documents or the Information contained therein; or

b. the rights of any Party to seek a more restrictive treatment of highly Confidential Information.

20. At the Conclusion of this litigation, the Court shall retain jurisdiction in the case for enforcement of this Order. At the Conclusion of this litigation, counsel for a Producing Party shall not be entitled to inspect and Copy those Documents previously filed under seal with the Court pursuant to this Order unless the Court determines the Producing Party has shown "Good Cause" to inspect and Copy said materials. An example of "Good Cause" may include the Producing Party's documentation of a violation of this Order by submitting an affidavit to the Court showing that not all of the Documents covered by this Order were returned or destroyed as provided by this Order. "Good Cause" may also include a Producing Party's documentation of a violation of this Order by submitting an affidavit to the Court showing that the Documents governed by this Order were being utilized in a manner not permitted by this Order. At least ten (10) days prior to any hearing on the issue of whether a Producing Party has shown "Good Cause," the Producing Party shall notify in writing all counsel of record of the Producing Party's attempt to establish "Good Cause" with the Court so as to permit the Producing Party to inspect and Copy those materials previously filed under seal with the Court.

21. By their signature upon the stipulation for the entry of this Order and their signatures below, counsel for the Parties signify their understanding of this Order and their agreement to abide by its terms unless and until it is modified or superseded by further order of this Court. The attorneys of record are responsible for employing reasonable measures, consistent with this Order, to control duplication of, access to and distribution of Copies of Confidential Information and to collect or destroy all Documents at the Conclusion of this litigation.

22. Designation of a Document, as defined in Paragraph 2, as "Confidential" shall not waive the rights of any Party to argue, in Court hearings and/or trial for the above captioned matter, that the Document designated as Confidential is not legally Confidential and/or a trade secret.

EXHIBIT A

MARTIN H. MYERS (SBN 130218) Email: mmyers@cov.corn GRETCHEN HOFF VARNER (SBN 284980) Email: ghoffvarner@cov. corn COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-5356 Telephone: +1 (415) 591-6000 Attorneys for Plaintiff GALLO GLASS COMPANY LISA G. SCHLITTNER (SBN 133306) Email: lgs@lorberlaw. corn LORBER GREENFIELD & POLITO LLP 150 Post Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: +1 (877) 229-9800 Attorneys for Defendant SPECIAL SHAPES REFRACTORY COMPANY EDWARD R. HUGUENIN (SBN 173653) Email: ehuguenin@greenhall.corn GREEN & HALL LLP 3741 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 290 Rosebille, CA 95661 Telephone: +1 (916) 367-7098 Attorneys for Defendant Nikolaus Sorg GmbH & Company KG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Civil Case No.: 1:16-cv-01446-110-BAM GALLO GLASS COMPANY, Plaintiff, TO STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER v. SPECIAL SHAPES REFRACTORY District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill COMPANY, INC., and NIKOLAUS Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe SORG GMBH & COMPANY KG, Defendants. Complaint Filed: September 28, 2016 Trial Date: June 4, 2019 AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS

The undersigned states subject to the penalties for perjury:

1. I was retained by a party to this litigation or by a party's counsel of record to offer analysis or advice, either as an expert witness or a consultant.

2. I have been furnished a copy of the Protective Order entered in this case restricting the use of Confidential information.

3. I promise to abide by the Protective Order with respect to Confidential documents and information furnished to me in this litigation.

4. I recognize that abiding by the Protective Order in this litigation mandates that any and all Confidential information, documents or material be used only for the purpose of the prosecution or defense of this captioned action, and that use of such Confidential information, documents or material for any other purposes or in any other contexts might subject me to liability to the Producing Party and/or others.

5. As a condition to receipt of documents marked Confidential in this litigation, I consent to personal jurisdiction over me in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, solely for the purpose of enforcing the Protective Order.

Dated: _______________, 20 ___ Signed: ______________________________ _______________________________ Print Name __________________________________ Address __________________________________ City, State, Zip MARTIN H. MYERS (SBN 130218) Email: mmyers@cov.corn GRETCHEN HOFF VARNER (SBN 284980) Email: ghoffvarner@cov. corn COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-5356 Telephone: +1 (415) 591-6000 Attorneys for Plaintiff GALLO GLASS COMPANY LISA G. SCHLITTNER (SBN 133306) Email: lgs@lorberlaw. corn LORBER GREENFIELD & POLITO LLP 150 Post Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: +1 (877) 229-9800 Attorneys for Defendant SPECIAL SHAPES REFRACTORY COMPANY EDWARD R. HUGUENIN (SBN 173653) Email: ehugueninggreenhall.corn GREEN & HALL LLP 3741 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 290 Rosebille, CA 95661 Telephone: +1 (916) 367-7098 Attorneys for Defendant Nikolaus Sorg GmbH & Company KG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Civil Case No.: 1:16-cv-01446-110-BAM GALLO GLASS COMPANY, EXHIBIT B TO STIPULATION FOR Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER v. District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill SPECIAL SHAPES REFRACTORY Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe COMPANY, INC., and NIKOLAUS SORG GMBH & COMPANY KG, Complaint Filed: September 28, 2016 Defendants. Trial Date: June 4, 2019 AND RELATED CROSS-CLAIMS

The undersigned states subject to the penalties for perjury:

1. I was retained by a party to this litigation or by a party's counsel of record to offer analysis or advice, either as an expert witness or a consultant.

2. I have been furnished a copy of the Protective Order entered in this case restricting the use of confidential information.

3. I have received notice that this litigation has concluded.

4. I certify that I have [destroyed] [returned] all of the documents protected by the Protective Order, including the documentary materials reflecting information contained in or derived from such documents.

Dated: ____________________, 20 ___ Signed: ______________________________ ___________________________________ Print Name ____________________________________ Address _____________________________________ City, State, Zip

ORDER

The parties' stipulated protective order filed on March 31, 2017 (Doc. 39) complies with the requirements of Local Rules 141 and 141.1. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Stipulated Protective Order is APPROVED in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 11, 2017 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FootNotes


1. The purpose of this provision is to alert the interested Parties to the existence of confidentiality rights of a Non-Party and to afford the Non-Party an opportunity to protect its confidentiality interests in this court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer