Elawyers Elawyers

PRINCE v. BERRYHILL, 2:16-cv-2404-EFB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170413b96 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2017
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . On March 9, 2017, plaintiff filed an opening brief and motion to remand, challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act and requesting the matter be remanded to the administration for payment of benefits. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff, however, did not file a motion for summary judgment. Without plaintiff movi
More

ORDER

On March 9, 2017, plaintiff filed an opening brief and motion to remand, challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act and requesting the matter be remanded to the administration for payment of benefits. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff, however, did not file a motion for summary judgment. Without plaintiff moving for summary judgment, the court is without authority to enter judgment in her favor should she successfully demonstrate that the Commissioner's decision is not supported by substantial evidence or the proper legal standards were not applied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a motion for summary judgment within 14 days of the date this order is served. The Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment shall be filed 45 days thereafter.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer