Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. HABASH, 1:15-cr-00286-DAD-BAM. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170419c21 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE; ORDER BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants HABASH and AKROUSH, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, the Court directed the parties "to meet and confer, including with Courtroom Deputy Harriet Herman, to select a date when they may appear for an informal conference to discuss further drug inspectio
More

STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE; ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants HABASH and AKROUSH, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, the Court directed the parties "to meet and confer, including with Courtroom Deputy Harriet Herman, to select a date when they may appear for an informal conference to discuss further drug inspection." (Doc. 225)

2. By this stipulation, the parties now agree to continue the drug inspection in this matter on the dates requested by the government in its filing in Document 223.

3. Specifically, the parties stipulate to the continued drug inspection on April 19 and April 20 from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. each day, or until completed, whichever occurs first. The drug inspection will take place at the same location and under the same conditions in effect during the drug inspection on April 6, 2016.

4. The parties further stipulate that the need for an informal conference is moot.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer