Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. McIntyre, 2:16-CR-224-JAM. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170501j58 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between plaintiff United States of America, on the one hand, and defendants Jenivive Sahra Jane McIntyre and Zachery Joseph Bastien, on the other hand, through their respective attorneys, that the presently set May 2, 2017, at 9:15 a.m., status conference hearing shall be continued by the Court to June 13, 2017, at 9:15
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between plaintiff United States of America, on the one hand, and defendants Jenivive Sahra Jane McIntyre and Zachery Joseph Bastien, on the other hand, through their respective attorneys, that the presently set May 2, 2017, at 9:15 a.m., status conference hearing shall be continued by the Court to June 13, 2017, at 9:15 a.m., to: (1) allow counsel for McIntyre to resolve his scheduling conflict with the presently set May 2, 2017, date as he has a state court case in Placer County at which he has been ordered to appear set for the same day; (2) allow counsel for McIntyre to review discovery, including Bates numbered materials McINTYRE_001001 through McINTYRE_001276, produced by the United States, conduct his independent investigation into the facts and applicable law, interview witnesses, discuss with his client potential pretrial resolution, and otherwise prepare McIntyre's defense; and (3) allow Todd Leras, Bastien's new attorney, appointed on April 7, 2017, time to review discovery (which he requested this week from the United States), conduct his independent investigation into the facts and applicable law, interview witnesses, discuss with his client potential pretrial resolution, and otherwise prepare Bastien's defense.

The parties agree and request that the Court find that: (1) the failure to grant this requested continuance would deny McIntyre continuity of counsel, and both defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence; and (2) the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a trial in a speedy trial.

The parties further agree and request that the Court order for the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which the trial of this case must commence, the time period from the date of this stipulation, April 25, 2017, to and including the June 13, 2017, status conference hearing, shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and B(iv) and Local Code T4 to allow continuity of McIntyre's defense counsel, and both defense counsel reasonable time to prepare their respective client's defenses.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its Order. It is hereby ORDERED that the presently set May 2, 2017, at 9:15 a.m., status conference hearing shall be continued to June 13, 2017, at 9:15 a.m.

Based on the representations of the parties in their stipulation, the Court finds that the failure to grant this requested continuance would deny defendant Jenivive McIntyre continuity of counsel, and both defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court hereby orders that for the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which the trial of this case must commence, the time period from the date of this stipulation, April 25, 2017, to and including the June 13, 2017, status conference hearing, shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and B(iv) and Local Code T4 to allow defendant McIntyre continuity of her counsel, and both defense counsel reasonable time to prepare their respective client's defenses.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer