SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT v. R.H. EX REL. J.H., 2:14-CV-01549-TLN-DB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170508623
Visitors: 19
Filed: May 05, 2017
Latest Update: May 05, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF SECTION 504 COUNTERCLAIMS; AND JUDGMENT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District ("the District") and Defendants/Counterclaimants R.H., by and through her Guardians ad Litem, J.H. and K.H., and J.H. and K.H., Individually, ("Parents"), hereby agree and stipulate to dismissal of the remaining issues and all remaining claims in the above-captioned case, including specifically
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF SECTION 504 COUNTERCLAIMS; AND JUDGMENT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District ("the District") and Defendants/Counterclaimants R.H., by and through her Guardians ad Litem, J.H. and K.H., and J.H. and K.H., Individually, ("Parents"), hereby agree and stipulate to dismissal of the remaining issues and all remaining claims in the above-captioned case, including specifically P..
More
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF SECTION 504 COUNTERCLAIMS; AND JUDGMENT
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District ("the District") and Defendants/Counterclaimants R.H., by and through her Guardians ad Litem, J.H. and K.H., and J.H. and K.H., Individually, ("Parents"), hereby agree and stipulate to dismissal of the remaining issues and all remaining claims in the above-captioned case, including specifically Parents' counterclaims under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Court previously entered judgment on the IDEA claims in this matter on February 22, 2017.
Therefore, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the District and Parents hereby jointly request that the case be dismissed with prejudice.
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties' foregoing stipulation and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that this case be dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
