ROBINSON v. COUNTY OF SHASTA, 2:14-cv-02910-KJM-KJN. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170515c80
Visitors: 12
Filed: May 12, 2017
Latest Update: May 12, 2017
Summary: AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The parties jointly request (ECF No. 62) to amend dates in the operative amended pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 56). Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request, as follows: Description Existing Date New Date Discovery Cutoff August 3, 2016 August 3, 2016 Expert Disclosures June 12, 2017 July 17, 2017
Summary: AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . The parties jointly request (ECF No. 62) to amend dates in the operative amended pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 56). Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request, as follows: Description Existing Date New Date Discovery Cutoff August 3, 2016 August 3, 2016 Expert Disclosures June 12, 2017 July 17, 2017 S..
More
AMENDMENT TO THE SCHEDULING ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
The parties jointly request (ECF No. 62) to amend dates in the operative amended pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 56). Good cause appearing, the court GRANTS this request, as follows:
Description Existing Date New Date
Discovery Cutoff August 3, 2016 August 3, 2016
Expert Disclosures June 12, 2017 July 17, 2017
Supplemental Expert Disclosures July 12, 2017 July 21, 2017
Completion of Expert Discovery August 30, 2017 September 30, 2017
All Dispositive Motions August 25, 2017 August 25, 2017
File Joint Pretrial Conference Statement December 22, 2017 December 22, 2017
Final Pretrial Conference January 12, 2018 January 12, 2018
Trial Briefs Due February 12, 2018 February 12, 2018
Trial (at 9:00 a.m.) February 26, 2018 February 26, 2018
This amendment does not alter any other portions of the operative amended pretrial scheduling order (ECF No. 56).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
