TALAVERA v. SUN MAID GROWERS OF CALIFORNIA, 1:15-cv-00842-AWI-SAB. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170517a14
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 15, 2017
Latest Update: May 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR MAY 23, 2017 STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . As Plaintiff has filed a notice that no class certification motion will be filed in this action, the Court sets a scheduling conference for May 23, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. The parties shall file a joint scheduling report on or before May 19, 2017, addressing 1. A proposed deadline to amend the pleadings; 2. A complete and detailed discovery plan addressing the following: a. A date f
Summary: ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR MAY 23, 2017 STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . As Plaintiff has filed a notice that no class certification motion will be filed in this action, the Court sets a scheduling conference for May 23, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. The parties shall file a joint scheduling report on or before May 19, 2017, addressing 1. A proposed deadline to amend the pleadings; 2. A complete and detailed discovery plan addressing the following: a. A date fo..
More
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE FOR MAY 23, 2017
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
As Plaintiff has filed a notice that no class certification motion will be filed in this action, the Court sets a scheduling conference for May 23, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9.
The parties shall file a joint scheduling report on or before May 19, 2017, addressing
1. A proposed deadline to amend the pleadings;
2. A complete and detailed discovery plan addressing the following:
a. A date for the exchange of initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) or a statement that disclosures have already been exchanged;
b. A firm cut-off date for non-expert discovery;
c. A firm date for disclosure of expert witnesses as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2);
d. A firm cut-off date for expert witness discovery;
e. Any proposed changes in the limits on discovery imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b); 30(a)(2)(A), (B); 30(d); or 33(a);
f. Whether the parties anticipate the need for a protective order relating to the discovery of information relating to a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information;
g. Any issues or proposals relating to the timing, sequencing, phasing or scheduling discovery;
h. Whether the parties anticipate the need to take discovery outside the United States, if so, a description of the proposed discovery; and
i. Whether any party anticipates video and/or sound recording of depositions. See Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference, ECF No. 3.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
