Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tandel v. County of Sacramento, 2:11-CV-00353-MCE AC. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170518b47 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 16, 2017
Latest Update: May 16, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff, Sandipkumar Tandel, is represented by Geri Green of the Law Office of Geri Lynn Green. Defendants, County of Sacramento, John McGinness, Deputy Stephanie Jacoby and Deputy Mark Medeiros are represented by Van Longyear and Peter C. Zilaff of Longyear, O'Dea & Lavra, LLP. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Sandipkumar Tandel, by an
More

STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

Plaintiff, Sandipkumar Tandel, is represented by Geri Green of the Law Office of Geri Lynn Green. Defendants, County of Sacramento, John McGinness, Deputy Stephanie Jacoby and Deputy Mark Medeiros are represented by Van Longyear and Peter C. Zilaff of Longyear, O'Dea & Lavra, LLP.

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Sandipkumar Tandel, by and through his attorney of record, and Defendants County of Sacramento, John McGinness, Deputy Stephanie Jacoby and Deputy Mark Medeiros, by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to the voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice.

Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, or expenses.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on the parties' stipulation and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer