Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. HERMOSILLO, 2:11-CR-00296 WBS. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170524883 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 23, 2017
Latest Update: May 23, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW DEFENDANT TO TRAVEL TO MEXICO EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Brian Fogerty, and Defendant, Sandra Hermosillo, by and through her counsel, Erin J. Radekin, hereby stipulate that Ms. Hermosillo may, with the permission of her pretrial services officer, and pursuant to such conditions as required by her pre-trial services office
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW DEFENDANT TO TRAVEL TO MEXICO

STIPULATION

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through its counsel, Assistant United States Attorney Brian Fogerty, and Defendant, Sandra Hermosillo, by and through her counsel, Erin J. Radekin, hereby stipulate that Ms. Hermosillo may, with the permission of her pretrial services officer, and pursuant to such conditions as required by her pre-trial services officer, travel to Mexicali, Mexico at any time between May 25, 2017 and May 31, 2017 to attend her father's funeral. Her father recently died and the funeral is scheduled for May 26, 2017. Ms. Hermosillo has traveled to Mexico to visit family on eight prior occasions while on pretrial release in this case, and there have been no reported violations of the court-imposed travel conditions.

It is further stipulated that pretrial services shall return Ms. Hermosillo's passport to her on the date of the filing of the proposed order to permit Ms. Hermosillo to travel to Mexico on or after May 25, 2017. Ms. Hermosillo must return to the United States no later than May 31, 2017 and must check in with and surrender her passport to her pretrial services officer within 24 hours of returning to the United States, but in no event later than June 1, 2017.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer