GIFFORD v. PUCKETT, 2:16-cv-00955-KJM-GGH. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170605858
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . On May 19, 2017, this court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of April 7, 2017 which, inter alia, struck the Second Amended Complaint as being in violation of the previously assigned magistrate judge's order that any Second Amended Complaint not exceed 25 pages. See ECF No. 64. On May 25, without leave of court or any basis in an applicable rule of law, plaintiff filed objections to the court's deni
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . On May 19, 2017, this court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of April 7, 2017 which, inter alia, struck the Second Amended Complaint as being in violation of the previously assigned magistrate judge's order that any Second Amended Complaint not exceed 25 pages. See ECF No. 64. On May 25, without leave of court or any basis in an applicable rule of law, plaintiff filed objections to the court's denia..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
On May 19, 2017, this court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of April 7, 2017 which, inter alia, struck the Second Amended Complaint as being in violation of the previously assigned magistrate judge's order that any Second Amended Complaint not exceed 25 pages. See ECF No. 64. On May 25, without leave of court or any basis in an applicable rule of law, plaintiff filed objections to the court's denial order. ECF No. 66. Because plaintiff's filing is not supported by rule or law, the court summarily overrules plaintiff's objections. The court warns plaintiff that future unauthorized filings may result in sanctions including dismissal.
This Order resolves ECF No. 64.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
