Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP v. EngagePoint, Inc., 2:17-cv-01163-KJM-KJN. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170609b96 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SUBMIT THE PETITION UPON THE RECORD AND BRIEFS ON FILE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 230(g) EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTED KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . WHEREAS, Petitioner Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP ("Petitioner") and Respondent EngagePoint, Inc. ("Respondent") commenced arbitration to resolve a dispute over Respondent's unpaid legal fees; WHEREAS, Petitioner and Respondent executed a settlement agreement and several exhibits thereto to resolve
More

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SUBMIT THE PETITION UPON THE RECORD AND BRIEFS ON FILE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 230(g)

EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTED

WHEREAS, Petitioner Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP ("Petitioner") and Respondent EngagePoint, Inc. ("Respondent") commenced arbitration to resolve a dispute over Respondent's unpaid legal fees;

WHEREAS, Petitioner and Respondent executed a settlement agreement and several exhibits thereto to resolve the arbitration dispute on May 26, 2017;

WHEREAS, the Arbitrator presiding over the arbitration entered, pursuant to a stipulation of Petitioner and Respondent, a Final Award on June 1, 2017;

WHEREAS, Petitioner filed in this Court a Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and for Entry of Judgement on June 2, 2017 (ECF No. 1);

WHEREAS, Petitioner submitted in support of the Petition a declaration from James E. Carbine (ECF No. 1-3) on June 2, 2017;

WHEREAS, Mr. Carbine's declaration states that he serves as counsel for Respondent, that "Respondent does not seek to have the Arbitration Award vacated, modified, or corrected[,]" and that "Respondent does not oppose the Petition to Confirm Arbitration Consent Award and Entry of Judgment, which seeks confirmation of the Arbitration Award and entry of judgment in Petitioner's favor in the amount of $1,544,883.68," (ECF No. 1-3); and

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Petitioner and Respondent that, pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), Mr. Carbine's declaration and this Stipulation shall serve as Respondent's statement of non-opposition to the granting of the Petition.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between Petitioner and Respondent that, pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Petition shall be submitted upon the record and briefs on file with the Court. Furthermore, Petitioner and Respondent jointly request that the Court give the Petition expedited consideration and grant the relief requested in the Petition at the Court's earliest convenience.

ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and the foregoing stipulation between Petitioner Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and Respondent EngagePoint, Inc., the Petition (ECF No. 1) shall be submitted upon the record and briefs on file with the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer