Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DOE v. COUNTY OF KERN, Case 1:15-cv-01637-JLT. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170613710 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 55) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On June 9, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this case pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 55) The stipulation relies on Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(a)(1) which provides, "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.". . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a not
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION

(Doc. 55)

On June 9, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this case pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 55) The stipulation relies on Fed. R. Civ.P. 41(a)(1) which provides, "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.". . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). However, having reviewed the stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:

1. This action is dismissed with prejudice, with such dismissal conditioned upon this order retaining jurisdiction to enforce the parties' settlement agreement; and

2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer