Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Coronado v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:15-CV-00806-AWI-SAB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170614813 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) ANTHONY W. ISHII , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND dollars and ZERO cents ($4,000.00). This amount represents compen
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney's fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND dollars and ZERO cents ($4,000.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The parties also agree that Plaintiff shall be awarded costs in the amount of $400.00, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. §1304 and 28 U.S.C. §1920.

After the Court issues an order for payment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's attorney. The government's ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to an offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). After the order of EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine if they are subject to an offset. If it is determined that Plaintiff's EAJA fees and expenses are not subject to an offset under Astrue v. Ratcliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010) and the Department of Treasury's Offset Program, then the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney, Jacqueline A. Forslund, based upon Plaintiff's assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff's attorney, and the check for costs shall be made payable to Plaintiff, Tim Coronado. The parties agree that whether these checks are made payable to Plaintiff or Jacqueline A. Forslund, such checks shall be mailed to Plaintiff's attorney at the following address: Jacqueline A. Forslund, Forslund Law LLC, P.O. Box 4476, Sunriver, Oregon 97707. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's Counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer