Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lee v. Berryhill, 1:15-cv-01859-BAM. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170616907 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . TO THE HONORABLE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT: The Parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Court's approval, stipulate that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of SIX THOUSAND, NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($6,900.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EA
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)

TO THE HONORABLE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT:

The Parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Court's approval, stipulate that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of SIX THOUSAND, NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($6,900.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel, Jonathan O. Peña, Esq.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of SIX THOUSAND, NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($6,900.00) in EAJA attorney fees shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and Plaintiff's attorney, Jonathan O. Peña, Esq., may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's attorney to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

ORDER

Based upon the parties' stipulation for the award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act filed on June 14, 2017, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that fees in the amount of $6,900.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the terms of the stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court should substitute Nancy A. Berryhill for Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit. No further action needs to be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 405(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer