Arvizu v. Hugler, 1:17-cv-00219-LJO-EPG. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170620842
Visitors: 31
Filed: Jun. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the parties' prior stipulation, on May 2, 2017, the Court ordered that plaintiffs file their amended Complaint no later than May 15, 2017, and that defendants file a response to the amended Complaint no later than June 15, 2017. See Order at ECF No. 19, p. 2. Plaintiffs filed their amended Complaint (ECF No. 20) on May 15, 2017. The amended Complaint asserts an individ
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the parties' prior stipulation, on May 2, 2017, the Court ordered that plaintiffs file their amended Complaint no later than May 15, 2017, and that defendants file a response to the amended Complaint no later than June 15, 2017. See Order at ECF No. 19, p. 2. Plaintiffs filed their amended Complaint (ECF No. 20) on May 15, 2017. The amended Complaint asserts an individu..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to the parties' prior stipulation, on May 2, 2017, the Court ordered that plaintiffs file their amended Complaint no later than May 15, 2017, and that defendants file a response to the amended Complaint no later than June 15, 2017. See Order at ECF No. 19, p. 2. Plaintiffs filed their amended Complaint (ECF No. 20) on May 15, 2017. The amended Complaint asserts an individual-capacity claim for damages against a new defendant, Susan Seletsky. In order to allow time for the Department of Justice ("DOJ") in Washington, D.C., to process Ms. Seletsky's request for DOJ representation in this matter, the parties request that the Court extend by fourteen (14) days the time for defendants' response to the amended Complaint, to June 29, 2017.
ORDER
For the reasons provided in the parties' stipulation, the Court finds good cause to extend by fourteen (14) days the time for defendants' response to the amended Complaint, to June 29, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
