Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Hernandez-Garcia, 2:17-cr-00032-MCE. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170620891 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney KATHERINE LYDON and Assistant Federal Defender MIA CRAGER on behalf of defendant JUAN HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, hereby stipulate to continue the status conference from June 22, 2017 to July 13, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. The reasons for this continuance are to allow defense additional time to review the proposed resolution with
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

Plaintiff, United States of America, by and through Assistant United States Attorney KATHERINE LYDON and Assistant Federal Defender MIA CRAGER on behalf of defendant JUAN HERNANDEZ-GARCIA, hereby stipulate to continue the status conference from June 22, 2017 to July 13, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

The reasons for this continuance are to allow defense additional time to review the proposed resolution with her client.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including July 13, 2017; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. It specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court further finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

Time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including July 13, 2017, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the June 22, 2017 status conference shall be continued until July 13, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer