Filed: Jun. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Local Rule 144(a)) WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Plaintiffs William Wiese, Jeremiah Morris, Lance Cowley, Sherman Macaston, Adam Richards, Clifford Flores, L.Q. Dang, Frank Federeau, Alan Normandy, Todd Nielsen, the Calguns Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, Firearms Policy Foundation, and Second Amendment Foundation (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants Attorney General Xavier Becerra, in his of
Summary: STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Local Rule 144(a)) WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Plaintiffs William Wiese, Jeremiah Morris, Lance Cowley, Sherman Macaston, Adam Richards, Clifford Flores, L.Q. Dang, Frank Federeau, Alan Normandy, Todd Nielsen, the Calguns Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, Firearms Policy Foundation, and Second Amendment Foundation (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants Attorney General Xavier Becerra, in his off..
More
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(Local Rule 144(a))
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Plaintiffs William Wiese, Jeremiah Morris, Lance Cowley, Sherman Macaston, Adam Richards, Clifford Flores, L.Q. Dang, Frank Federeau, Alan Normandy, Todd Nielsen, the Calguns Foundation, Firearms Policy Coalition, Firearms Policy Foundation, and Second Amendment Foundation (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendants Attorney General Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity, and Acting Chief Martha Supernor (collectively, "Defendants," and together with Plaintiffs, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2017, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief;
WHEREAS, on May 22, 2017, the parties stipulated to and Defendants filed a stipulation for an extension of time to respond to the originally-filed complaint;
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2017, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief;
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2017 Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which was renewed and refiled on June 14, 2017;
WHEREAS, Defendants' last day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint currently is June 20, 2017;
WHEREAS, in the interest of efficiency and economy, the Parties agree that Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint should be extended until after the resolution of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction;
WHEREAS, no previous extensions have been sought since the filing of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint;
THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rule 144 (a) and in consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby stipulated that:
Defendant's last day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint shall be no later than 21 days after entry of this Court's order regarding the Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
HAVING CONSIDERED THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED:
