Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL v. ZINKE, 1:05-cv-01207 LJO-EPG. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170622978 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jun. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . WHEREAS, on June 7, 2017, the parties filed the second joint stipulated request to extend the deadlines to file all motions regarding completeness of the administrative record, any motions or stipulations to limit review of the Sixth Claim as against Federal Defendants to the administrative record, and any notice to the Court and parties of intent to seek discovery on the Sixth Claim as against Federal De
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES

WHEREAS, on June 7, 2017, the parties filed the second joint stipulated request to extend the deadlines to file all motions regarding completeness of the administrative record, any motions or stipulations to limit review of the Sixth Claim as against Federal Defendants to the administrative record, and any notice to the Court and parties of intent to seek discovery on the Sixth Claim as against Federal Defendants from June 7 to June 21, 2017 (ECF No. 1090), which was granted by this Court on the same day (ECF No. 1092);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants have reached a tentative agreement that will avoid motion practice concerning discovery against the Federal Defendants with respect to Plaintiffs' Sixth Claim;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Federal Defendants are diligently working toward resolving questions about the scope of the administrative record in an effort to obviate the need for motion practice;

WHEREAS, the SRS Contractors are amenable to this stipulation provided that they are included in further meet and confer discussions between Federal Defendants and Plaintiffs regarding any agreement the Federal Defendants and Plaintiffs may reach to: (1) obviate the need for third-party discovery on Plaintiffs' Sixth Claim as against the SRS Contractors; or (2) limit review of Plaintiffs' Sixth Claim as against the Federal Defendants to an administrative record or any other limited scope of evidence.

STIPULATION

NOW THEREFORE, counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate to and jointly request an order extending the deadlines to file all motions regarding completeness of the administrative record, any motions or stipulations to limit review of the Sixth Claim as against Federal Defendants to the administrative record, and any notice to the Court and parties of intent to seek discovery on the Sixth Claim as against Federal Defendants by fourteen days, to and including July 4, 2017.

ORDER

Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS that the deadlines to file all motions regarding completeness of the administrative record, any motions or stipulations to limit review of the Sixth Claim as against Federal Defendants to the administrative record, and any notice to the Court and parties of intent to seek discovery on the Sixth Claim as against Federal Defendants shall be extended by fourteen days, to and including July 5, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer