MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 143 and the Court's June 22, 2016 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order [Dkt. #2], Plaintiff Tammy Lynn Logan ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Patriot National, Inc., Patriot Risk Services, Inc., Patriot Claim Services, Inc., and Patriot Risk Management, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record hereby stipulate and request that the Court enter and Order as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff commenced this action on April 22, 2016 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Sacramento [Dkt. #1, Exhibit A (Complaint)];
WHEREAS, Defendants removed this action to this Court on June 22, 2016 [Dkt. #1];
WHEREAS, on June 22, 2016 the Court issued an Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, which scheduled pretrial deadlines [Dkt. #2];
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2017, Plaintiff and Defendants filed a Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Discovery Deadlines [Dkt. #10];
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2017, the Court issued an Order Extending Discovery Deadlines [Dkt. # 12], setting, inter alia, the following deadlines:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has taken the depositions of six of Defendants' employees who are located out-of-state and Defendants have taken one day of Plaintiff's deposition;
WHEREAS, the Parties are interested in mediating this case and need to extend pretrial deadlines in order to allow sufficient time to do so;
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to proceed with private mediation based on the discovery completed to date and believe that judicial economy is best served by extending the pretrial deadlines, including the dispositive motion filing deadline, in order to allow sufficient time to do so.;
WHEREAS, the Parties may require additional time to complete further depositions and engage in other discovery;
WHEREAS, no trial date has been set for this case;
WHEREAS, the Parties seek to extend by 120 days all pretrial deadlines (including the fact discovery, initial expert disclosures, rebuttal expert disclosures, dispositive motion filing, and notice of trial readiness deadlines) previously set by the Court;
WHEREAS, in light of the above, good cause exists to extend the current discovery and expert disclosure schedule;