Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. FAROOQ, 1:16-cr-00127-DAD-BAM-2. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170703796 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE SENTENCING HEARING TO JANUARY 22, 2018 AND TO MODIFY PRETRIAL RELEASE CONDITIONS DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Jeffrey T. Hammerschmidt, the attorney for defendant CHAUDHRY A. FAROOQ, and Grant B. Rabenn, Assistant United States Attorney, that the sentencing hearing set for July 24, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. be continued to January 22, 2018 at 1:30 p.m. IT IS ALSO HEREBY STIPULATED that Mr. Farooq's terms of supervised
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE SENTENCING HEARING TO JANUARY 22, 2018 AND TO MODIFY PRETRIAL RELEASE CONDITIONS

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Jeffrey T. Hammerschmidt, the attorney for defendant CHAUDHRY A. FAROOQ, and Grant B. Rabenn, Assistant United States Attorney, that the sentencing hearing set for July 24, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. be continued to January 22, 2018 at 1:30 p.m.

IT IS ALSO HEREBY STIPULATED that Mr. Farooq's terms of supervised release be modified to allow him to leave his home to find employment for reasonable periods of time as determined by his Pretrial Services Officer.

The stipulated continuance will conserve time and resources for both the parties and the court, and the delay resulting from this continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h) (7)(A).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The court has reviewed and considered the stipulation of the parties to continue the sentencing in this case. Good cause appearing, the sentencing as to the above named defendant currently scheduled for July 24, 2017, is continued until January 22, 2018, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 5 before Judge Dale A. Drozd.

The defendant's condition of release is modified to allow the above named defendant to leave his home to find employment for reasonable periods of time as determined by his pretrial services officer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer