Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

San Joaquin General Hospital v. Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc., 2:16-cv-01921-MCE-EFB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170712a63 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATES MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . The parties, Plaintiff SAN JOAQUIN GENERAL HOSPITAL and Defendants, CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. and CIGNA HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ("CIGNA"), through their respective attorneys of record, hereby jointly stipulate to a 120-day extension of the currently scheduled discovery deadlines as set forth below. Pursuant to Rule 16, a party may seek modification of a scheduling order, i
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATES

The parties, Plaintiff SAN JOAQUIN GENERAL HOSPITAL and Defendants, CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. and CIGNA HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ("CIGNA"), through their respective attorneys of record, hereby jointly stipulate to a 120-day extension of the currently scheduled discovery deadlines as set forth below. Pursuant to Rule 16, a party may seek modification of a scheduling order, including modification of a discovery cut-off date.

WHEREAS, on July 6, 2016, Plaintiff filed the action in state court;

WHEREAS, on August 12, 2016, CIGNA removed the action to this Court;

WHEREAS, on August 15, 2016, the Court issued The Initial Pre-Trial Scheduling Order setting the current deadline to complete all non-expert discovery 365 days from the filing of the original complaint in the action, i.e., July 6, 2017;

WHEREAS, on June 20, 2017, the Court approved the Protective Order to allowing the parties to discovery relating to information that may contact trade secrets, confidential commercial, personal or financial information, and/or protected health information;

WHEREAS, due to the number of patient claims at issue, the parties are unable to complete the discovery process prior to the July 6, 2017 deadline;

WHEREAS, trial date has not been set;

WHEREAS, the parties believe the extension of discovery cut-off will not affect any other deadline established by the Court;

WHEREAS, the parties have not made any previous request to extend any discovery deadlines in this action;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties through their undersigned counsel of record that:

1. The non-expert discovery cut-off deadline is extended 120 days to November 3, 2017.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Filing Attestation: I, Barbara V. Lam, hereby attest that I have received authorization for the electronic signature(s) indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court does find good cause to extend non-expert discovery cut-off 120 days, to November 3, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer