U.S. v. SHAVLOVSKY, 2:11-CR-427 TLN. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20170727968
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING RESTITUTION HEARING STIPULATION TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a restitution hearing on July 27, 2017. 2. By this stipulation, the parties request that the Court vacate the currently scheduled restitution hearing. 3. As of today's date, no victim
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING RESTITUTION HEARING STIPULATION TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a restitution hearing on July 27, 2017. 2. By this stipulation, the parties request that the Court vacate the currently scheduled restitution hearing. 3. As of today's date, no victim h..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING RESTITUTION HEARING STIPULATION
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for a restitution hearing on July 27, 2017.
2. By this stipulation, the parties request that the Court vacate the currently scheduled restitution hearing.
3. As of today's date, no victim has submitted complete documentation regarding their entitlement to restitution or the identity of the entity that suffered the final loss in this case. The parties agree that, should a victim submit the required documentation, the government may request that the matter of restitution be reopened.
FINDINGS AND ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
