Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. BURTON, 2:17-mj-00096 EFB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170727a24 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING AND FOR EXCLUSION OF TIME [18 U.S.C. 3161] KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Jared Dolan, counsel for the plaintiff United States of America, and defendant Donald Burton, by and through his counsel William Portanova, Esq., that good cause exists to extend the preliminary hearing currently set for July 7, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. to August 4, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. purs
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING AND FOR EXCLUSION OF TIME

[18 U.S.C. § 3161]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Assistant United States Attorney Jared Dolan, counsel for the plaintiff United States of America, and defendant Donald Burton, by and through his counsel William Portanova, Esq., that good cause exists to extend the preliminary hearing currently set for July 7, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. to August 4, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d).

Good cause exists to extend the time for the preliminary hearing within meaning of Rule 5.1(d). Discovery has been provided to the defense, including multiple audio and video recordings. Counsel for defendant will need time to review the materials and advise his client with respect to his options with respect to pre-indictment resolution or preparing the matter for trial post-indictment. As a result, the defendant agrees that a continuance of the preliminary hearing date will not prejudice him as it will allow his counsel the opportunity to understand the nature and scope of the evidence in this case in order to prepare an effective defense, as well as to discuss pre-indictment resolution. The defendant is out of custody

Counsel further stipulate that an exclusion of time from July 7, 2017, to August 4, 2017, is appropriate under the Speedy Trial Act because the United States has provided pre-indictment discovery and defense counsel will need time to review that discovery. As a result, counsel for both parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time and outweigh the defendant's interest in a speedy trial, as well as the public's interest in a speedy trial, so that counsel for each defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Therefore, time should be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) (Local Code T4).

ORDER

Based upon the representations by counsel and the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Court finds good cause to extend the Preliminary Hearing currently set for July 7, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., to August 4, 2017, at 2:00 p.m., pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1(d); and

2. Based upon the above representations and stipulation of the parties, the Court further finds that the ends of justice outweigh the best interest of the public and each defendant in a speedy trial. Accordingly, time under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded through August 4, 2017, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) (Local Code T4).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer