Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fajardo v. Berryhill, 1:16-cv-1784-EPG. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170811a08 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties to the above-captioned action, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have an extension of time to September 8, 2017 to file and serve a pleading in response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. Additional time is needed due to defense counsel's brief illness and resulting scheduling conflict. Defense counsel needs additional
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

The parties to the above-captioned action, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate, subject to the Court's approval, that Defendant shall have an extension of time to September 8, 2017 to file and serve a pleading in response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. Additional time is needed due to defense counsel's brief illness and resulting scheduling conflict. Defense counsel needs additional time to adequately consider the complete record, pleadings, and the agency's position. Plaintiff's counsel does not object and agrees that all subsequent filing deadlines should be extended accordingly.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court finds good cause for an extension of time to September 8, 2017 for Defendant to file and serve a pleading in response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. All subsequent filing deadlines are extended accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer