Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Trujillo v. Carter's Retail, Inc., 17-cv-00787-LJO-BAM. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170816a84 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Jose Trujillo ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Carter's Retail, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant may have a 21-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be due on or
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Jose Trujillo ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Carter's Retail, Inc. ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that Defendant may have a 21-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be due on or before September 4, 2017.

This stipulation will not affect or alter any deadline previously set by Court order.

The reason for the present extension is that the parties are in the midst of negotiating a resolution of this matter.

Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel for Plaintiff has authorized submission of this document on his behalf.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following deadline applies: a response by Defendant shall be due on or before September 4, 2017.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is continued from September 19, 2017 to October 11, 2017 at 9:00AM before Judge McAuliffe in Courtroom 8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer